| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
Radiation Oncology Journal > Volume 41(3); 2023 > Article
Kim: Has the growing evidence of radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma increased the use of radiotherapy in elderly patients?
Primary liver cancer, mostly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. HCC develops mostly in patients with chronic liver disease, such as cirrhosis from hepatitis B and C virus infection, alcoholic abuse, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and the risk of developing HCC increases with age [2]. The selection of the treatment modality for HCC is generally determined by the tumor stage, underlying liver function, and performance status [3,4]. The clinical practice guidelines for HCC in Korea were first published in 2003 and have been revised four times since then in 2009, 2014, 2018, and 2022, respectively [4-6]. Over the past two decades, the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of HCC has changed significantly in the Korean clinical practice guidelines for HCC [4] due to growing evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety in treating HCC of various stages and clinical scenarios [7-15]. Furthermore, RT can be considered an alternative or complementary option for all stages of HCC that may be unsuitable for or ineffective to other locoregional treatments, including surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, or transarterial chemoembolization, with or without systemic treatments.
In the last issue of the Radiation Oncology Journal, the paper titled “Radiotherapy trend in elderly hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2017” by Bae et al. [16] evaluated the trends of the use of RT in elderly patients with HCC. They found that the proportion of elderly patients (age ≥75 years) with HCC increased significantly from 3.1% in 2006 to 11.4% in 2017. The use of RT in elderly patients with HCC has also increased significantly from 6.1% between 2005 and 2009 to 15.3% between 2015 and 2017. Additionally, the proportion of elderly patients with HCC receiving RT with curative intent using advanced RT techniques, including stereotactic body radiotherapy and proton beam therapy, was significantly higher than that of younger patients (37.3% vs. 25.0%). The overall survival (OS) of elderly patients with HCC is worse than that of younger patients. This could be attributed to comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, and poor performance status, which are more common in elderly patients than in younger patients. However, the OS of elderly patients with HCC who received RT as the initial treatment did not differ significantly from that of younger patients. Based on these findings, the authors concluded that RT could play an increasingly important role in the treatment of elderly patients with HCC in the future.
The treatment of elderly patients is often complicated. First, although defining elderly patients based on chronological age is a simple approach, the cutoff age for elderly patients has not yet been established (70, 75, or 80 years) [17-20]. Second, chronological age alone cannot fully explain the complex biological events and related conditions of the aging process, which include comorbidities, physical function, nutritional status, and mental function. These factors can affect treatment compliance, risk of adverse events, life expectancy, and other outcomes. Therefore, elderly patients are difficult to manage and likely to be undertreated in the real world. Only a few retrospective studies with small study populations are available on RT in elderly patients. However, available data suggest that RT in elderly patients is effective and safe, similar to that in younger patients. Similarly, Bae et al. [16] provide valuable insights regarding the changing trends in the use of RT in elderly patients with HCC and highlight its potential role as a curative treatment option in this population. The treatment of elderly patients with HCC, including RT, remains challenging, and prospective evidence in the literature and clinical practice guidelines is lacking. As life expectancy and the risk of developing HCC increase with age, the proportion of elderly patients with HCC also increases. Therefore, further investigations on the role of RT in elderly patients are warranted, as this has important implications in clinical practice.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Rumgay H, Arnold M, Ferlay J, et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J Hepatol 2022;77:1598–606.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Trevisani F, Cantarini MC, Wands JR, Bernardi M. Recent advances in the natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2008;29:1299–305.
crossref pmid
3. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018;69:182–236.
crossref pmid
4. Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA) and National Cancer Center (NCC) Korea. 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022;28:583–705.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Korean Liver Cancer Association; National Cancer Center. 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut Liver 2019;13:227–99.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Korean Liver Cancer Study Group and National Cancer Center, Korea. Practice guidelines for management of hepatocellular carcinoma 2009. Korean J Hepatol 2009;15:391–423.
crossref pmid
7. Yoon SM, Ryoo BY, Lee SJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization plus external beam radiotherapy vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic vascular invasion: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:661–9.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Yoon SM, Lim YS, Park MJ, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy as an alternative treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One 2013;8:e79854.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Kim TH, Koh YH, Kim BH, et al. Proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase III trial. J Hepatol 2021;74:603–12.
crossref pmid
10. Kim N, Cheng J, Jung I, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation in Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2020;73:121–9.
crossref pmid
11. Wahl DR, Stenmark MH, Tao Y, et al. Outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy or radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:452–9.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Hara K, Takeda A, Tsurugai Y, et al. Radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma results in comparable survival to radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score analysis. Hepatology 2019;69:2533–45.
crossref pmid pdf
13. Jeong Y, Lee KJ, Lee SJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for small (≤ 3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparison analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;36:1962–70.
crossref pmid pdf
14. Ueno M, Takabatake H, Itasaka S, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation for single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis of their impact on liver function and clinical outcomes. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021;12:2334–44.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Zhao Q, Zhu K, Yue J, et al. Comparison of intra-arterial chemoembolization with and without radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2016;13:21–31.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. Bae BK, Yu JI, Park HC, Goh MJ, Paik YH. Radiotherapy trend in elderly hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2017. Radiat Oncol J 2023;41:98–107.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, Mohile S, et al. Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations. Ann Oncol 2015;26:288–300.
crossref pmid
18. Teraoka Y, Kimura T, Aikata H, et al. Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2018;48:193–204.
crossref pmid pdf
19. Jang JY, Jung J, Lee D, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for elderly patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective observational study. J Liver Cancer 2022;22:136–45.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Iwata H, Ogino H, Hattori Y, et al. Image-guided proton therapy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: high local control and quality of life preservation. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:219.
crossref pmid pmc
Editorial Office
Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center,
Proton Therapy Center, B2, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
Tel : +82-2-3410-3617
E-mail: rojeditor@gmail.com, roj@kosro.or.kr
Copyright © The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology.                      Developed in M2PI
Close layer
prev next